Using Passenger on OS X for Rails development

Comments

1. Simeon 1 day later: (delete)

   Are you using leopard? I did this the other day, but I only get seg faults using the built in apache. I was really hoping this would be the silver bullet, but its giving my nothing but trouble :( ¶

2. Manfred Stienstra 1 day later: (delete)

   Yeah, it's fine on a number of Leopard installs in our office, on my personal laptop I'm having segfaults too. Do you happen to have a case sensitive filesystem? ¶

3. Simeon 1 day later: (delete)

   Nope, just the stock mac fs. Its odd how it picks and chooses :)

   I dont feel like installing mac ports, which is what the folks I have seen using it have done. ¶

4. Tim Dysinger 1 day later: (delete | show email)

   I installed it on my macbook, but I didn't use the Apple-installed Apache because of all the warning's saying don't do that in the installer.

   Here's how I did it. http://dysinger.net/2008/04/14/installing-apache-and-mod_rails-on-mac-os-x-leopard/ ¶

5. Manfred Stienstra 1 day later: (delete)

   Yeah, installing Apache would be a solution, but I would prefer it if it would work with OSX out of the box. It would be a shame to loose the simplicity of Passenger on OSX. ¶

6. Manfred Stienstra 15 days later: (delete)

   Since 1.0.2 everything runs fine on OSX. ¶

7. topfunky 21 days later: (delete | show email)

   I also had to edit /etc/hosts to add the app1.local and corresponding domains.

   An added benefit is that pages that reference multiple dynamically generated resources will load much faster. I have reporting pages that generate 20+ graphics, and it was nearly unusable with a single Mongrel. Passenger spawns extra processes and works much faster, even in development. ¶

8. marcus 34 days later: (delete)

   haha that was great. i was hesitant to switch on my dev box because i thought it'd be a pain (even though my experience w/ mod_rails elsewhere indicated otherwise). it took me 10 minutes and it works perfectly so far.

   thanks for the writeup! ¶

9. Erwin 37 days later: (delete | show email)

   great... running under 10.5.2..
   only problem not yet solved, all images, javascript files, css files cannot be loaded , still with 0.0.0.0:3000
   http://0.0.0.0:3000/images/pdmlogo.gif?1211129216
   ..
   how can I fix it ? I tried to set RAILS_ROOT to mydomain.local, but then it failed...

   thanks ¶

10. Erwin 37 days later: (delete | show email)

    sorry .. got it.. solves this issue ... (I needed to think like an Apache... !)

    config.action_controller.asset_host = "http://mydomain.local";

    inserted in config/environments/development.rb ¶

11. Cameron 37 days later: (delete)

    This installs perfectly on OS 10.5.2 with Passenger 1.0.5. Many thanks, I'm replacing mongrels asap... ¶

12. Manfred Stienstra 38 days later: (delete)

    @Erwin, RAILS_ROOT is the root directory of the Rails project (ie. /Users/manfred/Code/my_rails_project) and has nothing to do with the domain.

    Fixing the asset_host is indeed the right way to solve it. ¶

13. nick 40 days later: (delete | show email)

    Is there any way to still use the debugger in this case? i.e. script/server -u ¶

14. Manfred Stienstra 40 days later: (delete)

    @nick, no I don't think you can access the debugger. ¶

15. Brandon Martinez 61 days later: (delete | show email)

    @nick: what are you using the debugger for? You could just use this if you are trying to debug your rails apps:

    tail -f rails_app/log/development.log

    That will give you live output from your rails app. ¶

16. Jamie Orchard-Hays 65 days later: (delete | show email)

    Manfred, thanks for the helpful write-up. I have done this setup on my Mac (Leopard) and find that the first virtual host always wins--pointing at the second one always goes to the first. I'm wondering if anyone else has had this problem. My /etc/hosts file looks like:

    127.0.0.1 localhost app.local app.admin

    but it doesn't matter what I change the names to.

    Thanks,
    Jamie ¶

17. Jamie+Orchard-Hays 65 days later: (delete | show email)

    Actually, the whole hosts file looks like:

    127.0.0.1 localhost app.local app.admin
    255.255.255.255 broadcasthost
    ::1 localhost
    fe80::1%lo0 localhost ¶

18. Manfred Stienstra 67 days later: (delete)

    Jamie, I don't really understand what you're talking about. ¶

19. Jamie+Orchard-Hays 68 days later: (delete | show email)

    Manfred, never mind. I was missing

    NameVirtualHost *:80 ¶

20. Sam 76 days later: (delete | show email)

    Thanks for the write-up. I got everything running fine in under 5 minutes! ¶

21. Andrew Vit 80 days later: (delete)

    Any way to specify a different environment than the predetermined "development" or "production"? ¶

22. Andrew Vit 80 days later: (delete)

    Oops, that last comment was meant for the Passenger prefPane post... ¶

23. Manfred Stienstra 80 days later: (delete)

    No, just development and production. ¶

24. pedz 102 days later: (delete | show email)

    I'm not getting this to work for me. In the examples you have, what is the URL used to access a site? I assume it is:

    http://project1.local/what/ever/...

    I can't get that name to map to 127.0.0.1. I tried Top Funky's idea of adding it to /etc/hosts but then when I do:

    host project1.local

    I get:

    Host project1.local.my.domain.com not found: 3(NXDOMAIN)

    I'm running 10.5.4 ¶

25. Manfred Stienstra 102 days later: (delete)

    Yes, you should be able to access the project through http://project1.local once you've added it to /etc/hosts or your DNS server. I'm afraid you don't really provide enough information for me to guess what's wrong though.

    Note that 'host' doesn't know about /etc/hosts nor the OS X Directory Services. Sometimes a 'dscacheutil -flushcache' and a Safari restart helps when you have trouble resolving stuff. ¶

26. flax (salomon.valverde@gmail.com) 120 days later: (delete)

    how do you get passenger to run your rails app in development mode? ¶

27. Manfred Stienstra 120 days later: (delete)

    Using RailsEnv: http://www.modrails.com/documentation/Users%20guide.html#rails_env ¶

28. flax 120 days later: (delete)

    hah!

    RTFM right?

    thanks much ¶

29. der_flo 138 days later: (delete)

    A quick question:
    Where goes the STDOUT and STDERR? I usually use "puts" in development and a cannot redirect these logs via the "ErrorLog" Apache directive. Any ideas? ¶

30. Manfred Stienstra 138 days later: (delete)

    It's probably a good idea to use logger.debug instead and look at RAILS_ROOT/log/development.log. ¶

Add your comment

Your name: (also leave contact information)

Your email address (will not be shown):

The url of your website:

Remember me

Your comment: